Monday, September 7, 2009
Why or why not
When it come's to the issue of to do somthing or not do somthing were always left with the question of choice. Even when it comes down to a positive or a negative outcome the pressure of choice always ways on our minds. In the case of a negative outcome people seem to always chose the more dangerious side than the stragiht and narrow. Why do people tend to gavitate to the option that could potentaly bring havoc to their lives? I beleive it's our nature to test ourselves to beat the odds, or fill that need that craving to walk on the wild side. In addition, why does that which is bad is always the most interesting to us? Is it that we have to fill that void that need to be curious? What ever the case I say live life to the fullest! How you do it is up to you so what side are you?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Great post to think about. The days of danger are long gone, I guess I'm more straight and narrow. Maybe just getting old.
ReplyDeleteI rather be in the side where it will make me happy, eventhough I know that their will be some consequences. It's better to take chances, because I'll never know it might do good to me. If it turns out bad, it's always good to learn from my mistakes.
ReplyDeleteThis is some tasty food for thought. I think if there was a path in the middle, that's where I would go. Some choices I stick to the straight and narrow and I'm fine with it. Some other choices, taking the wild side gives this sudden rush of excitement and intensity of not knowing what to expect. I guess a little of both balances everything out right?
ReplyDelete